Structured intake review for plaintiff law firms —your first intake review is free

The Cases Your Firm Takes Should Reflect Your Collective Judgment — Not Just the Most Enthusiastic Partner in the Room

ClaimReviewPanel is the structured intake platform for plaintiff law firms — every attorney scores every claim independently before the group meets, and your intake decisions reflect the full judgment of your team.

Start Your Free Intake Review →See how it works

What is ClaimReviewPanel?

The step before the Monday morning meeting

ClaimReviewPanel gives every reviewing attorney a simple link — no login — where they evaluate each incoming claim against your firm's intake criteria before any group discussion begins. Liability strength, damages potential, evidence quality, SOL and jurisdiction, firm fit. Every score is independent.

When the group meets, you have everyone's full assessment — including the reservations that wouldn't have survived the room.

The problem

Enthusiasm usually wins the room

At most plaintiff firms, intake decisions are made by whoever makes the strongest case for a claim in the Monday morning meeting. The attorneys who have reservations mention them. The attorneys who are excited push back. Enthusiasm usually wins.

Sometimes enthusiasm is right. Sometimes it costs the firm two years and the kind of money that doesn't appear on a balance sheet but shows up in the conversations partners have when they think about what they should have known going in.

A structured intake process doesn't make better predictions. It surfaces the reservations that get swallowed in the room.

“One of the partners had reservations. She mentioned them in the meeting, got outvoted by enthusiasm, and we took the case.”

Every intake decision that comes down to whoever speaks most confidently in the room isn't a process. It's just whoever speaks most confidently in the room.

What ClaimReviewPanel does

Structure for the decision that costs the most to get wrong

Every case your firm takes commits attorney time, case costs, and years of capacity. ClaimReviewPanel makes that commitment a decision your whole team actually made.

Independent scores, before the room.: Every reviewing attorney evaluates each claim on their own, before any group discussion begins. No attorney sees another's assessment until they submit their own — so the first opinion voiced doesn't become everyone's opinion.
A link, not a login.: Each reviewing attorney gets a personal link by email and scores from any device. No accounts to provision, no software to roll out, nothing for your firm's IT to approve first.
Your intake criteria, your weights.: Liability strength, damages potential, evidence and documentation quality, statute of limitations and jurisdiction, firm fit and resource allocation — or whatever your firm actually screens on. Configure it once and reuse it every cycle.
The reservations make it to the table.: When the group meets, every attorney's independent assessment is already visible — including the doubts that would have gone unsaid once the room started leaning. The discussion starts from everyone's real view.
A consistent way to decide what you take.: Every claim runs through the same criteria, scored by the same panel, on the same scale. Intake stops depending on which claims happened to come up on a week when the right partner was in the room.
A record of how you decided.: Every attorney's score on every claim, attributed and timestamped, exported as a clean summary — so a declination or a case you took is a decision you can explain to a partner, a referring firm, or yourself two years later.

How it works

Three steps, and the meeting changes

1 Set up your intake review: Add your incoming claims and your intake criteria. Invite your reviewing attorneys by email. Each gets a personal link — no login needed.
2 Attorneys score independently: Each reviewer evaluates each claim on your criteria — liability, damages, evidence, SOL, firm fit — before seeing any other attorney's assessment.
3 The group meets with full information: Every attorney's independent assessment is visible before the discussion begins. The reservations are already on the table. The decision reflects the full judgment of your team.

Pricing

Your first intake review is free

Run a real intake review on real claims with your real panel before you pay anything. And if you are an innocence project or a conviction integrity unit, it stays free — permanently.

Plaintiff firms

First intake review free

For plaintiff firms, mass tort shops, and class action practices. No payment until your second review — talk to us about firm pricing when you get there.

Unlimited reviewing attorneys
Unlimited claims per review
Your intake criteria and weights
Independent scoring enforced before discussion
Full documented export on every review

Start Your Free Intake Review →

Innocence programs

Free, permanently

Innocence projects, conviction integrity units, public interest law firms, and government programs use ClaimReviewPanel at no cost. Not a discount, not a trial — free.

Everything in the firm plan
Free permanently — not a trial
Unlimited reviewers and case applications
For innocence projects and conviction integrity units
For public interest law firms and government programs

Get Set Up Free →

Who this is for

Built for the teams who decide what walks in the door

If more than one person weighs in on which claims your organization takes — and those opinions currently get resolved in a meeting rather than on paper — ClaimReviewPanel was built for you.

Plaintiff law firms: Managing partners and intake directors deciding which incoming claims the firm commits attorney time and case costs to.
Mass tort and class action practices: Screening claim files at volume, where an inconsistent intake standard compounds across hundreds of cases instead of one.
Innocence projects and conviction integrity units: Reviewing case applications with limited staff and far more requests than capacity — where the decision not to take a case matters as much as the decision to take one. Free permanently.
Public interest law firms: Allocating scarce resources across more worthy claims than any one organization can carry, and needing to show how those choices were made.

Why firms choose ClaimReviewPanel

Not a case management system. Not a CRM.

It surfaces the reservations.: The attorney with doubts writes them down before the room forms a view. That is the entire point — and it is the thing a meeting structurally cannot do.
It makes intake consistent.: The same criteria, the same panel, the same scale on every claim. Which cases you take stops depending on who happened to be in the room that Monday.
It costs nothing to try.: Your first intake review is free, with unlimited attorneys and unlimited claims. Run it on the claims already sitting in your queue.
It takes no rollout.: Reviewing attorneys get a link and score from any device. No accounts, no training, nothing for IT to approve before your next intake cycle.
It leaves a record.: Every attorney's score on every claim, attributed and timestamped — so you can explain a declination, or revisit how a case you took looked going in.
It's free for innocence work, permanently.: Innocence projects, conviction integrity units, and public interest programs pay nothing. Ever.

ClaimReviewPanel does not manage your cases, track your deadlines, or store your files — your case management system already does that. It handles one decision: whether a claim becomes one of your cases at all.

A structured intake process doesn't make better predictions. It surfaces the reservations that get swallowed in the room.

Get in touch

Questions about ClaimReviewPanel, your intake criteria, or how a review runs with your panel? Email us directly — tell us how many attorneys weigh in on intake and what you screen on, and we'll get back to you.

Start Your Free Intake Review →Dan@JurorSearch.com

First intake review free — free permanently for innocence projects and conviction integrity units. There is nothing to sign up for before you write to us.